Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michele Morin's avatar

I love endnotes, but stand with you in the opinion that footnotes would have been more convenient.

I have often wondered whether EE would have become a writer--or maybe more specifically a KNOWN writer--without the platform provided by the spearing. I expect that talent trumped platform in her era?

One of the main gifts of your work was the contextualization of EE’s life. I have had the mistaken tendency to think of her as a contemporary figure. Sometimes for better and sometimes for worse, she was shaped by a very specific subset of evangelicalism. Certainly the self-discipline and rigorous biblicism her family instilled were foundational to the person she became.

Expand full comment
Amy Mantravadi's avatar

I am more likely to read prefatory material if it is written by the author him/herself. If it is a modern introduction to an old classic text, I prefer to dive into the text itself and possibly read the introduction later. Forewords, in my experience, are often an excuse to associate a more famous name with the book in the hope of increasing sales. Whether I read them largely depends on if I can finish them in three minutes or less.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts